Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
"To ask the Manager to record my serious objection to the planning application for a mast at the entrance to Moyville Estate on the grounds of its close proximity to residents and the care facility located within the grounds of the Augustinians, both within our guideline of 100 metres?"
Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Denis Ryan
"To ask the Manager to outline the programme of footpath repair for the Terenure Rathfarnham Ward?"
Headed Item
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Development, Econ. & Transport Planning Dept.
Responsibility:
Development, Econ. & Transport Planning Dept.
New Works
(no report)
Correspondence
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Development, Econ. & Transport Planning Dept.
Responsibility:
Development, Econ. & Transport Planning Dept.
Correspondence
(none received)
Correspondence
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Planning Not is use
Responsibility:
Planning Not is use
Correspondence
(none received)
Headed Item
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Roads Department
Responsibility:
Roads Department
New Works
(no report)
Correspondence
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Roads Department
Responsibility:
Roads Department
Correspondence
(none received)
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Muiris O'Keeffe, Andrew O'Mullane
"That the Manager move immediately to take all measures to alleviate traffic parking problems being experienced in Rathfarnham Village and for the Manager to engage directly with Duchas to immediately have the Rathfarnham Castle car park opened for public car parking."
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor K. Warren
Responsibility:
Paddy McNamara
To ask the Manager to make a full statement concerning the operation of management companies in new apartment and housing complexes in South Dublin County Council, to outline exactly the role of this local authority in terms of appointing such companies who operate key essential services in new communities, and if any legislation is in place to govern such arrangements?
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Headed Item
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Housing Administration
Responsibility:
Housing Administration
Report on Part 8 of Planning and Development Regulations 2001 - Cushlawn - Openings to Kiltipper Road
(circulated herewith)
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.
Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor J. Lahart
Responsibility:
Martin Judge
That the Council undertakes a review of the regulations governing the siting of planning application roadside public notices, particularly in light of obvious flaws relating to where a planning application may be lodged within an estate that directly affects residents to the rear of that house but located in a different estate.