Council Meetings

Search

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor C. Brady
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Amendment 3 (Finnstown) Amend the proposed SLO no 1 to delete: Development may not commence until Dart+ Southwest or the commencement of an equivalent rail service to the Dart has commenced construction or operation, as may be relevant. And replace with: That development shall not commence in advance of the delivery of additional capacity on the rail service to Adamstown and Kishoge, and that the occupation of residential units be subject to the commencement and operation of the Dart+ South West service, or the commencement of an equivalent rail service to the Dart.

Reason: The current rail infrastructure is already operating at full capacity and urgently needs to be upgraded before additional demand comes onstream. Homes must be delivered hand in hand with the necessary increased infrastructure, therefore the population along this rail corridor should not be increased until Dart+ South West is operational.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor W. Carey
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Proposed Amendments to Variation no 2.- Adamstown SDZ West - Page 48 Motion: This Council agrees to amend Variation No. 2 (Amendment No.10) to read: 'Development should only proceed following the construction of a shared pedestrian/cycle connection from the junction of the Celbridge Rd/New Celbridge Link Rd to the junction of the Celbridge Rd/Cooldrinagh Lane.'

Reason: This being an 'Active Travel' improvement measure to the west, enabling newer communities to travel safely via the new Celbridge Link Rd-Celbridge Rd-Cooldrinagh Lane-N4 Footbridge-Cooldrinagh Ln Nth-Leixlip Rd/Village/St Catherine's Park and beyond.

Proposed by, Cllr Loftus, Carey, Dunne, Whelan & Mannion

Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor A. Smyth
Responsibility:
Andy McNally

"To ask the Council for a usage report for 2026 for pavilion in Dodder Valley Park with reference to the type of groups?"

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor R. Mannion
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

If Proposed Amendment no. 7 - Edmondstown lands proceeds, that the existing SLO ("to ensure that any future development has regard to the boundary with and protection of the amenity and function of Edmondstown Golf Course") in relation to the 'RES' zoned lands at Whitechurch - Edmondstown which adjoin the golf club lands to the South, be expanded to include all boundaries adjoining 'RES' zoned lands.

Additional proposers: William Carey, Louise Dunne, Daniel Loftus, Niamh Whelan

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor C. Brady
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Amendment No. 2 Adamstown SDZ West . To add SLO To support the provision of community parking on lands identified under Variation No. 2 within the Adamstown area, to serve existing and future residents, visitors and community uses, and to be delivered in a co-ordinated manner as part of the overall development of these lands, and to ensure that such facilities are designed and laid out to allow for future adaptation or redevelopment, having regard to changes in transport provision and demand over time.

Reason: To support existing and future parking demand in Adamstown in a planned and co-ordinated manner, while ensuring flexibility for such lands and facilities to be repurposed over time in line with changes in public transport provision, travel patterns and wider infrastructure delivery, similar to approaches under consideration in Clonburris.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor R. Mannion
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

MOTION: To reject Amendment No. 21 - Stocking Avenue, Ballycullen (School Reservation), and retain the current designated school zoning.

REASON: Significant development in the area is likely to increase demand on local schools - the Dept. of Education observation note same concerns, and some current schools are already struggling to meet demand; additionally existing schools are all in excess of 1km from much of much of Stockingwood and adjacent developments, with steep topography, which seems counter intuitive to the county objective to encourage active travel.

Additional proposers: William Carey, Louise Dunne, Daniel Loftus, Niamh Whelan

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor C. Brady, Councillor S. O'Hara
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Amendment No. 17 Adamstown South and West (Outer) Policy CS3: Future Strategic Long-Term Development Areas To add SLO To investigate the delivery of a regional sports stadium, associated playing pitches, and a multi-sport campus comprising indoor and outdoor facilities, on lands identified under Variation No. 2 within the Adamstown area. Reason: To support the current and future sporting needs of the Adamstown and Lucan area, including demand arising from population growth and planned development, and to investigate the provision of regional-level indoor and outdoor sports facilities capable of hosting larger games and wider community use.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor L. de Courcy
Responsibility:
Hazel Craigie, Eoin Burke

To reject Amendment No. 13 Rathcoole and to retain the SSR on the lands.

REASONS Road infrastructure: While the construction of the 'Western Orbital Route' Road as part of the six-year road programme in the County Development Plan...The description of this road in the County Development Plan, Table 7.5 is that it will provide a 'link between the N7 and the N4 Leixlip Interchange with a route by-pass function around Rathcoole and Saggart and the potential for a further extension of this route from the N7 to the N81 is welcome, traffic is currently heavily congested for long periods of the morning and afternoon/evening, due, in no small part to the traffic in and out of Greenogue Business Park. The proposed removing of the SSR designation should be delayed until at least construction of the orbital route has commenced. Public transport options from Rathcoole to the city centre are limited to two infrequent bus routes (69, hourly & 126, every 40 minutes). The Luas is at capacity, and it is a 60-minute walk from Whitehouse Lane. Building homes to the west of Rathcoole with limited public transport options will force more people to rely on private vehicles, further contributing to the existing congestion problems. Education: As per COS8 SLO 1 To identify a site for the appropriate location of a new post primary school within the Neighbourhood catchment area by the Department of Education. An acknowledgement by the Department of Education of the Variation's proposal is not a commitment to build a secondary school. The proposed removing of the SSR designation should be delayed until at least construction of the school has commenced.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor D. Loftus
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Proposed Amendments to Variation No. 4 - Tuber lane North - Page 164 Motion: This council agrees to insert a new point 3j in CS7 SLO4 (Amendment No.4) to read: 'Development will only proceed in unison with an agreed new bus route connection being established and operational between Adamstown/Lucan and Tallaght.'

Reason: • Both Lucan & Tallaght are major urban neighbouring population centres, that continue to see extensive planned development with significant further development proposed.

• To improve transport connectivity ie. to the Luas Cheeverstown, Luas Tallaght-City Ctr.

• To provide connectivity to Tallaght Hospital, IT Tallaght, Stadium, Square and other vital services.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor C. Brady, Councillor Joanna Tuffy
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Amendment No. 17 Adamstown South and West (Outer) Proposed Variation Objectives Policy CS3: Future Strategic Long-Term Development Areas Insert to CS3 SLO 1: Page 25 written statement 'and to collaborate with Kildare County Council in respect of green belts as set out in Objective GI 6 Chapter 4 of the County Development Plan 2022 to 2028.' 'To protect and enhance the Green Infrastructure Corridor along the western boundary with Kildare and protect the Grand Canal Corridor pNHA as part of any future development proposals for these lands to the south and west of Adamstown SDZ. Appropriate ecologically informed buffers for GI corridors and the Grand Canal pNHA will form part of any such proposal, and to collaborate with Kildare County Council in respect of green belts as set out in Objective GI 6 Chapter 4 of the County Development Plan 2022 to 2028' Reason - To ensure proper planning and policy alignment between South Dublin County Council and Kildare County Council in respect of green infrastructure and green belt protection along the county boundary.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor D. Loftus
Responsibility:
Hazel Craigie, Eoin Burke

Proposed Amendments to Variation no 2.- Adamstown SDZ West - Page 48 Motion: This Council agrees to amend Variation No. 2 (Amendment No.10) to read: 'Development should only proceed following the construction of a shared pedestrian/cycle connection from the junction of the Celbridge Rd/New Celbridge Link Rd to the junction of the Celbridge Rd/Cooldrinagh Lane.' Reason: This being an 'Active Travel' improvement measure to the west, enabling newer communities to travel safely via the new Celbridge Link Rd-Celbridge Rd-Cooldrinagh Lane-N4 Footbridge-Cooldrinagh Ln Nth-Leixlip Rd/Village/St Catherine's Park and beyond.

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor L. Dunne
Responsibility:
Amanda Mills

"This Area Committee acknowledges that some remedial works have recently been undertaken in response to concerns raised by residents of Mac Uilliam Lane. However, significant issues remain unresolved. Therefore, this Area Committee calls on Management to engage with residents, carry out a comprehensive inspection of the building, and develop a clear action plan to address the outstanding concerns?"

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor R. Mannion
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

MOTION: That this Council retains the RU zoning on the Edmondstown lands (Proposed Amendment no. 7)

REASON: Rezoning of this site from RU to RES does not meet the brief of providing "deliverable" housing under this plan, as the current owners have clearly stated their opposition to the rezoning given their lack of intention to sell or develop the site, and their desire to continue to farm their land.

Co-signed by: William Carey; Louise Dunne; Daniel Loftus; Niamh Whelan

Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor E. Ó Broin
Responsibility:
Director of Climate Action

To ask the Chief Executive how SDCC justifies allowing sports teams from outside of SDCC to book the county's public all weather football facilities?

Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor D. Richardson
Responsibility:
Gary Walsh

"Can the Manager report on road repairs in the Tallaght area as some estates are in bad condition with pot holes?"

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor B. Lawlor
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Amendment 19 Add SLO text to site as follows - That any development on these lands provide operational electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure at a minimum requirement of 20% of all on-street parking spaces within the development and furthermore, that the design and installation of this infrastructure includes the necessary capacity to facilitate future expansion of EV charging provision to additional parking spaces, as demand increases. Reason: This supports Ireland's Climate Action Plan target of 30% of the private car fleet being electric by 2030. Co-Sponsored: Cllr. David McManus, Cllr. Sarah Barnes

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor M. Johansson
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Motion: To add the following SLO to Amendment 14 Foxhunter: That no development on these lands be permitted vehicular access through the Hermitage Estate.

Reason: To protect the existing residential development in Hermitage estate from additional through-traffic and potential rat-running from the N4.

 

Co-signed by Cllr Helen Farrell and Cllr Liona O'Toole

 

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor B. Lawlor
Responsibility:

Amendment No. 2 Add SLO text to site as follows - That any development on these lands provide operational electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure at a minimum requirement of 20% of all on-street parking spaces within the development and furthermore, that the design and installation of this infrastructure includes the necessary capacity to facilitate future expansion of EV charging provision to additional parking spaces, as demand increases.

Reason: This supports Ireland's Climate Action Plan target of 30% of the private car fleet being electric by 2030.

Co-Sponsored: Cllr. David McManus, Cllr. Sarah Barnes

Question
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor F. Timmons
Responsibility:
Lorcan Brennan

To ask the Chief Executive for a detailed report into what measures are being put in place to contain the white-clawed crayfish plague outbreak at Corkagh Park lakes and the Camac. When will these measures be put in place?

Motion
Meeting:
Submitted by:
Councillor M. Johansson
Responsibility:
Eoin Burke, Hazel Craigie

Motion: To add the following SLO to Amendment No. 16 Liffey Valley MRC (p537): Any residential development must include community facilities, arts facilities, public recreational facilities, primary care provision and public green spaces. Reason: In the interest of sustainable planning and to ensure that residents have access to public facilities rather than exclusively private facilities in the immediate area. Also, it should be acknowledged that the Liffey Valley LAP 2008 included civic amenities in this location which were never developed.