COMHAIRLE CONTAE ÁTHA CLIATH THEAS
SOUTH DUBLIN COUNTY COUNCIL
MEETING OF SDZ, LAPS AND PLANNING PROJECTS
Friday, January 26, 2018
MOTION NO.30
MOTION: Councillor P. Gogarty
avoid an excessive concentration of social housing by ensuring that:
- no one street or apartment block can consist of more than 30% social housing
- no more than two social housing units can be placed side by side
Cllr G. O'Connell
REPORT:
Response
South Dublin County Council as the planning and housing authority for the area is both obligated and mandated to achieve the best possible outcomes in terms of planned, socially integrated housing provision for all of its citizens within the planning scheme. As a major landowner in control of approx. 22% of the land bank within the plan area it is committed to fully utilising this asset together with the statutory obligations imposed by Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) to maximise the distributed provision of social and affordable housing throughout the SDZ area. The distribution will be subject to appropriate master planning, will involve the integrated development off all lands collectively and where it necessitates commensurate land transfers will be subject to council approval. This integrated approach is aligned to the County Development Plan, the council Housing Strategy, national housing and planning policy and sufficiently agile to allow for the incorporation of any new or additional national strategies supportive of affordability.
Further to the response to Item 56498 and, until such time as Government Policy on Affordable Housing changes, the promotion of Affordable Housing would be inconsistent with Housing Strategy for the County and the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as mended). An increase in the provision for social housing would also be inconsistent with Housing Strategy for the County and the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as mended).
Further to the aspect of the motion that seeks to limit social housing within a block, side by side or within a street, it is advised that the wording of Section 2.1.6 allows for flexibility in relation to how and where social housing is delivered, while avoiding an over concentration in general. The wording of the proposed motion is overly restrictive and would significantly diminish the ability to deliver social housing particularly within an apartment block or row of housing. The extent of a street is also not precisely defined and, within this context, the motion would add uncertainty to the delivery of social housing. In the absence of official research/guidance on such it is considered that the proposed maximums are not appropriate.
In the context of the nature and prescription of Development Areas as precise planning units under the Draft Planning Scheme, it is accepted that Section 2.1.6 could be amended to avoid excessive concentration of social housing units in Development Areas.
Recommendation
It is recommended that this motion is adopted with amendment.
Include the following additional text under Section 2.1.6 (Social Housing):
To ensure an appropriate distribution of new social housing, and to avoid an excessive concentration of social housing in Development Areas.
Strategic Environmental Assessment of Chief Executive’s Recommendation
No interaction with Strategic Environmental Objectives.
Appropriate Assessment Screening of Chief Executive’s Recommendation
No likely significant effects on European sites within the SDZ’s zone of influence are predicted.