COMHAIRLE CONTAE ÁTHA CLIATH THEAS
SOUTH DUBLIN COUNTY COUNCIL
MEETING OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN MEETING
Thursday, June 18, 2015
MOTION NO. 276
MOTION: Councillor D. Looney
11.6.5 (iii) Waste Recovery and Disposal Facilities
Paragraph 2 currently states;
"The provision of waste recovery facilities, pre–treatment infrastructure and development of indigenous secondary waste processing, including Material Recovery Facilities (MRF) and Waste Transfer Stations will be facilitated at appropriate locations within the County. Facilities will only be permitted where they do not materially detract from the Land Use Zoning Objective and are at a scale appropriate to its surrounding environment and adjoining amenities."
Change to;
"The provision of waste recovery facilities, pre–treatment infrastructure and development of indigenous secondary waste processing, including Material Recovery Facilities (MRF) and Waste Transfer Stations will only be facilitated at appropriate locations within the County. No new facilities will be permitted in the Dublin 12 and 22 area of the County. Facilities will only be permitted where they do not materially detract from the Land Use Zoning Objective and are at a scale appropriate to its surrounding environment and adjoining amenities."
Co signed by Cllr FN Duffy
REPORT:
The motion proposes to add that
‘No new facilities will be permitted in the Dublin 12 and 22 area of the County’ into Section 11.6.5 (iii) Waste Recovery and Disposal Facilities.
Dublin 12 and Dublin 22 include a number of industrial estates (including parts of Ballymount) zoned ‘EE” ‘To provide for enterprise and employment related uses’. Refuse Transfer Stations and Recycling facilities are amongst the uses ‘permitted in principle’ in the EE zone. It is considered that any proposals for Waste Recovery and Disposal Facilities in the County should be considered on their merits, having regard to the policies and objectives of the Plan and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
The Development Plan is a strategic County wide document and it is not recommended to prohibit development based on postal codes in geographical sections of the County without assessment or consideration of the zoning of the areas.
Recommendation
It is recommended that this motion not be adopted.